🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to withdraw from an international accord designed to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense discussions in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last year, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has provoked broad protest both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for additional consideration if he has objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights activist.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in other member states